The status of women as a key indicator of modernity in Muslim society more

Sebastiano Sali 24 - MAY - 2010 ʻThe status of women is a key indicator of modernity in Muslim societyʼ. Introduction A modern societies level of development can be assessed through the status of its members, regardless of their gender, class or education. However, when the focus falls on non Western societies, the status of women become a fundamental issue. Particularly, within the context of Islam, the subject of gender relations is highly sensitive, both on a popular and academic level1 . This paper will argue that the rationale of using womenʼs status as an indicator for the level of modernity achieved in non Western Muslim societies, can set up a vicious circle, that reinforces the orientalist bias. Indeed, such an evaluation is often affected by a widespread belief that secular-liberal regimes holds a more favourable stance towards women2 . In addition, some Western feminist scholars have developed an approach to this issue based on the triangle Imperilled Woman, Dangerous Muslim Men, Civilised European3, that exasperates this dynamic. 1 Esposito J. L., ʻIntroductionʼ, in Haddad Y. Y. and Esposito J. L., Islam, Gender and Social Change, Oxford University Press, 1998, p. XII. 2 Hatem M. F., ʻEgyptian Discourses on Gender and Political Liberalization: Do Secularist and Islamist View Really Differ?ʼ, Middle East Journal, 48:4, 1994, p. 661. 3 Razack S. H., ʻThe ʻSharia Law Debateʼ in Ontario: the Modernity/Pre-Modernity Law Distinction in Legal Efforts to Protect Women from Cultureʼ, Feminist Legal Studies, 15, 2007, p. 5. Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... Consequently, this approach leads to two main outcomes. First, the adoption of policy measures and the development of social4 and discursive5 practices that strengthen the original mythology of a modern West, versus a non/pre/hostilely modern Orient. Secondly, a refusal to approach the question of womenʼs status in society through a more vast understanding of the specific cultural, historical and social background in which Muslim women live 6, justified by the idea that multiculturalism and feminism are at odds 7. A critical approach will be used to present an alternative standpoint on the issue of gender in Islam societiesʼ. In particular, this approach incorporates the idea of modernity as an incomplete project8 in which the focus is centred on agency; in this case that of Islamic women. Moreover, this rationale stresses the importance of varying cultural, historical and social backgrounds in which the question of womenʼs status is set, as the fundamental criteria of analysis for a deeper investigation that avoids a facile conclusion, like the clash of modernities one 9. Thus, the first section of this paper will reaffirm the importance of the gender issue in the logic of Orientalism, clarifying that the very essence of the orientalist bias is itself gendered. The second section will present the core assumption of the orientalist point of view, that is secular-liberal regimes are more incline to treat women better: an axiom that will be shown not to be always true. The third section will illustrate some feminist assumptions that, instead of underpinning womenʼs conditions, they undermine it, by 4 Razack S. H., ʻImperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Force Marriagesʼ, Feminist Legal Studies, 12, 2004, pp. 129-174. 5 Hirschkind C. and Mahmood S., ʻFeminism, the Taliban and Policy of Counter-Insurgencyʼ, Anthropological Quarterly, 75:2, 2002, pp. 339-354. 6 Anthias F., ʻBeyond Feminism and Multiculturalism: Locating Difference and the Politics of Locationʼ, Womenʼs Studies International Forum, 25:3, 2002, pp. 275-286. 7 Okin S. M., ʻIs Multiculturalism Bad for Women?ʼ, Boston Review Books, October/November 1997. Available online at: http://bostonreview.net/BR22.5/okin.html (accessed on 6 May 2010). 8 9 Habermas J., ʻModernity - An Incomplete Projectʼ, in Foster H., Postmodern Culture, Pluto Press, 1985. Abu-Lughod L., ʻOrientalism and Middle East Feminist Studiesʼ, Feminist Studies, 27:1, 2001, pp. 101-113 and Jamal A., ʻTransnational Feminism as a Critical Practice. A reading of feminist discourses in Pakistanʼ, Meridians: feminism, race and transnationalism, 50:2, 2005, pp. 57-82. 2 IPM8430 24 May 2010 reinforcing the idea of clash of civilisations. The fourth section will introduce a critical feminist approach that, taking into consideration the previous discussion, would be able to develop a more effective rationale to tackle the gender issue in Muslim societies. 1. Orientalism, Gender and (Pre)Modernity Edward Saidʼs “Orientalism” is a very well known and appreciated work10 . However some scholars, especially those with a feminist viewpoint, criticise this work for not paying much attention to the status of women issue11. Instead, they argue that women played a very important part in the textual production of the orientalist bias. Women actively participated in making gender, as a differentiating term, integral to the structure of the orientalist discourse and to the individual experience of it12. Nonetheless, it must be emphasised that in Saidʼs seminal work, to be considered more of an analytical device rather than a holistic theory, the very essence of the whole rationale of Orientalism is itself gendered. Indeed, Orientalism has been defined as the practice of male domination, or patriarchy, whereas the Orient was represented as feminine, portrayed through sensual women and harem symbolism13. Then, it does not surprise that the debate about modernity and women is characterised by such a Manichean narrative. The modern West, respectful of women on one hand; the pre-modern Orient mistreating them on the other. The main literature has, by and large, claimed an essential difference exists between the modern Western and the traditional Islamic approaches to womenʼs status. In particular, Islamic societies are presumed to be much more hostile towards womenʼs 10 11 12 13 Said E., Orientalism: Western Conception of the Orient, 1995, Penguin. Turner B. S., Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism, Routledge, 1994. Lewis R., Gendering Orientalism: race, femininity and representation, Routledge, 1996, p. 18. Said E., ʻOrientalism Reconsideredʼ, Cultural Critique, 1, 1985, p. 103. 3 Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... rights, while Western societies are supportive womenʼs rights of equality and liberty 14. In this sense the West is seen as culturally committed to the values of the Enlightenment, on the other hand the non West is understood as completely non modern or even worse, hostile to the process of modernisation15 . In the same way, in modernist terms, pre-modern women are then conceived as absent from the public sphere, unseen and unheard. Thus modernity, is seen as the process that has to repair this imbalance, by making women part of discursive as well as printed works16. This emancipatory narrative is then, clearly based upon the silenced/ voiceless, segregated and oppressive image of the Muslim women, unable of any independent agency 17. 2. The Secular-Liberal Regimes Appreciation One of the most important assumptions posed by the orientalist approach is that the Western model is the most likely to lead to modernity. Though this stance implies the idea that all the secular-liberal regimes inspired by Western canons, notwithstanding their scarce political credentials, are generally more beneficial for womenʼs rights. However this is not necessarily true. A critical approach to this assumptions is presented by the feminist discourses. First of all, this approach tends to discredit the belief that the system of gender relations in liberal systems is universally valid. In fact, the main assumptions of the liberal discourse are affected and often transformed by cultural, political, economic, class and ethnic relations, that may lead to unexpected outcomes. 14 Keddie N. and Beck L., ʻIntroductionʼ, in Keddie N. and Beck L., Women in the Muslim World, Harvard University Press, 1978. 15 16 17 Razack, ʻThe ʻShariaʼ, p. 7. Najmabadi A., ʻVeiled Discourse-Unveiled Bodiesʼ, Feminist Studies, 19:3, 1993, p. 487. Najmabadi A., ʻGender and Secularism of Modernity: How Can a Muslim Woman be French?ʼ, Feminist Studies, 32:2, 2006, p. 246. 4 IPM8430 24 May 2010 In particular, it has been argued that liberal societies produce two specific forms of disadvantage for Muslim women. Firstly, denying women the full rights and privileges accorded to men, taking for granted an idea of citizenship that does not consider all that is feminine. Secondly, according those same rights and privileges without distinction to men and women, but at the same time conveying a different interpretation of citizenship for different genders18. A clear example of this dynamic is the evolution of the gender issue in Egypt. The already existing sexual divisions of roles and labour were further exaggerated by the colonial domination, that imposed foreign values destroying the native ones. As a result, the indigenous society collapsed internally and men retired into the shell of rigid customs and sterile ritual, finding in it a form of security 19. On this basis, beginning from the 1950ʼs, as part of the process of constructing a new secular/national Egyptian society, gender difference was identified in terms of hierarchical relations of power between the state and women. The right to work, for instance, has always been depicted as an inconvenience. Departing from the secular ideal of domesticity, the importance of womenʼs role as householders did not diminish with the introduction of the modern right to work. In fact, a woman working was considered to be doing it as an economic necessity rather than as a free conscious choice. Indeed, the rules for political womenʼs organisations, set up in the 1980ʼs, were much more illiberal than those for all the other political groups. Again, the choice for autonomous political agendas was denied in the name of a special relationship between the women groups and the state20. 18 19 20 Hatem, ʻEgyptian Discoursesʼ, pp. 663-663. Ahmed A. S., Discovering Islam. Making sense of Muslim history and society, Routledge, 1998, p. 185. Hatem, ʻEgyptian Discoursesʼ, pp. 664-666, 674. 5 Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... Notwithstanding the evolution from Sadatʼs paternal and protective standpoint of the 1970ʼs, to Mubarakʼs sameness equality of the 1980ʼs, the previous examples clarify that womenʼs rights have always been second class ones. Then, it becomes easy to understand how the question of women is strictly related to specific backgrounds. In particular, significant variations in the conditions of Muslim women rely on single political projects for the construction of a modern liberal and secular state. The expansion of womenʼs citizenship rights coincided with the secularist push for the nationalist state-building project21 . However this does not always mean an advancement in womenʼs status. It has been argued though, that it is highly likely that state capitalism negatively affected the condition of nineteenth century Muslim women. Thus, the conditions which the twenty-first century feminist movements protest against, partially find their roots in the outcome of the process towards the Western modernisation model, rather than in Islamic conservative values. As a consequence, this perspective undermines all the thinking of the struggle between a modern West against a pre modern Orient22 . Though, it may appear that the whole mythology of the time of the Prophet as a golden age for Islamic women, when they had an active role in education, commerce, and politics, is not only part of the Islamic fundamentalist propaganda23 , but rather may contain some kind of truth. Nevertheless, it is certain that although new and modern rights have been acquired by women, social habits persist to dominate, making those rights still unattainable 24. 21 22 Kandioty K., ʻWomen, Islam and the Stateʼ, Middle East Report, 173, 1991, pp. 10, 12. Cole J. R., ʻFeminsm, Class and Islam in Turn-of-the-Century Egyptʼ, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 13:4, 1991, p. 390. 23 24 Gole N., ʻSnapshots of Islamic Modernitiesʼ, Dedalus, 129:1, 2000, p. 99. Haddad Y. Y., ʻIslam and Gender: Dilemmas in the Changing Arab World, in Haddad and Esposito, Islam, p. 7. 6 IPM8430 24 May 2010 However, some attempts made by Western feminist movements in order to try to overcome this situation, have had the contrary effect of strengthening the logic of the clash, instead of positively affecting the status of Muslim women. 3. Legislative, Social and Discursive Misleading Feminist Practices These counter-productive feminist campaigns are observable on three different levels of practice: legislative, social and discursive. The 2005 argument occurred in Ontario about the religious-faith-based interpretation of the Arbitration Act 25 , is an example of a feminist campaign aiming to affect the legislative process. Feminist groups, Muslim as well as non-Muslim, opposed to the possibility given by the law to solve problems of family law privately, according to Sharia law. It has been argued that this protest was based on the dangerous framework of secular versus religious, which is nothing but another facet of the modern West versus the pre modern Orient dichotomy 26. The main argument of the protest was the image of the Imperilled Muslim Women. Feministsʼ argued that Muslim women were at risk and extremely vulnerable within their communities and families. Therefore, they had to be protected by the secular state, the best protector of womenʼs rights, because of the total separation of religion and law27. The handbook published in 2003 by the Norwegian Human Rights Service foundation about the problem of Human Visas, represents the combination of social practices and legislative aims. The issue was raised in opposition to the practice of forced marriages. 25 The Arbitration Act is a law approved in 1991 that enables individuals to hire third parties to privately adjudicate their conflicts using agreed upon rules or laws. For the complete text see http://www.canlii.org/en/ on/laws/stat/so-1991-c-17/latest/so-1991-c-17.html (accessed 8 May 2010). 26 27 Razack, ʻThe ʻShariaʼ, p. 6. Razack, ʻThe ʻShariaʼ, p. 9. 7 Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... Firstly, because they represent an open violation of a womanʼs free will; secondly, because they are often the escamotage for family reunions. Human Rights Service based its entire campaign on the clash between the West versus non Western societies, in which the individual is dependent on religion, clan, caste or class. The practice of forced, pre-arranged marriages is used to underline the patriarchal features of those societies where the status of women is low. Along this line of argument, such a practice is then compared to the West that in contrast, has been able to free itself from such a feudal past. On the contrary this did not happen in the Muslim world. Therefore, the only solution to achieve modernity against this background, seems to be by the imposition of law by the secular state28. Finally, the 1999 American Feminist Majority campaign against the Talibansʼ mistreatment of Afghan women exemplifies feminist discourse based on the Save the Third World rationale. This campaign achieved a great success, even amongst those people who are usually sceptical towards the feminist movement. That was partially due to the widespread idea that the Talibanʼs rules for women were unacceptable by any standards. Later on, the first lady Laura Bush seized that kind of approach saying on a radio show that all the civilised people 29 are speaking out in horror for the women and the children of Afghanistan30 . In addition, the increasing importance of Islamic fundamentalism reinforced the Imperilled Women logic, giving a universal and ready made explanation for every kind of violence that was inflicted on Muslim women in the Muslim world. Therefore, the message to public opinion was clear: all those people that consider Islam important for their lives, represent authoritarian, intolerant and misogynist societies31. 28 29 30 31 Razack, ʻImperilled Muslimʼ, pp. 136-138. My emphasis. Hirschkind and Mahmood, ʻFeminismʼ, pp. 340-341. Hirschkind and Mahmood, ʻFeminismʼ, pp. 347-350. 8 IPM8430 24 May 2010 4. A Critical Feminist Approach Feminism has been defined as “a mode of analysis, a method of approaching life and politics”, whose power is to connect everyday life with the analysis of social institutions that affect life32. However, the previous examples illustrated that the feminist approach itself can influence policy, social and discursive practices, that may lead to the unwanted outcome of strengthening the logic of the clash of modernity based on the gender issue. As an alternative, a more critical approach to the idea of modernity and to the question of womenʼs rights in the Muslim world, has been claimed to achieve different conclusions. Such an approach would depart from the Habermasian idea of modernity. According to Habermas, modernity can and will no longer borrow its orientation criteria from different models, but rather it has to “create its normativity out of itself”33. Indeed, as it is the sense of modernity of the agency that creates the self-enclosed canons of being classic, overcoming the traditional difference between classic and modern, modernity can be seen as an unfinished process, centring the spotlight on the role of the agency 34. Thus, applying this methodology to the gender issue in Muslim societies, it undermines some core assumptions of the orientalist bias. Firstly, the necessity of having models of modernity, namely the Western one. Secondly and most importantly, by pointing out the importance of agency, it undermines the orientalist view that the social structure of non-Western societies is characterised by the absence of a civil society: a network of institutions that can mediate between the state and individuals. In that way, according to the orientalist view, individuals, women in particular, would be easier subjected to the arbitrary rule of the despotic state35. 32 33 34 35 Hekman S., ʻTruth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisitedʼ, Signs, 22:2, 1997, pp. 342-343. Habermas J., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: twelve lectures, MIT Press, 1991, p. 7. Habermas, ʻModernityʼ, pp. 4, 13. Turner, Orientalism, p. 23. 9 Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... Therefore, the practical application of this analytical device to the gender issue in Muslim societies intends to highlight Muslim womenʼs appropriation of their own modernity. In fact, contemporary Islamic women are not only the subject of discussed controversy, but they also are active political actors in the public debate. They can exploit the uniqueness of their educational power, which is both religious and secular, thereby being able to criticise Western modernity without falling in the trap of religious backwardness. Through this process that stands at the frontier of political ideology and social practices, women represent a challenge at the same time both for the development of a different notion of modernity as well as for the shape of a new identity 36. Women have also the means to break another key assumption of the orientalist logic. Orientalism has always portrayed Islam as a monolithic religion, with no differences all over the world. Against this view, the focus on the agency of women gives way to stress the development of different womenʼs subjectivity and personal experiences, emphasising the importance of different cultural, historical and social backgrounds, as well as the need for a deeper understanding of them37 . Therefore, a Critical Feminism would encourage taking into consideration the significance of historical context, stressing the importance of studying womenʼs dissimilar relationships to constitutionality in varying settings. Indeed, rather than a comparative approach to modernities, based on the framework of Sisterhood and/or on the rationale of the Imperilled Muslim Women, a transnational study would be able to provide a more vast and profound understanding. Keys assumptions of this thinking should be: understanding the process of Islamisation of society as it is historically situated in every single context, rather than as a universal religious fundamentalism; that feminists accounts are not only a reaction to 36 37 Gole, ʻSnapshotsʼ, p. 95-101. Abu-Lughod, ʻOrientalismʼ, p. 111. 10 IPM8430 24 May 2010 Western colonial domination and ongoing dependancy, but also a criticism of indigenous social class, culture and politics; that Islamist projects of modernity are not against modernity, but rather that they propose an alternative, Islamised expression of modernity; that it is necessary to deconstruct the idea that womenʼs activism, particularly in politics, is a privilege of elite women while the masses are conceived as fundamentalist38. In this way women would be able to appropriate their own modernity, breaking the vicious circle that departs from the aim of freeing women, leading to the reinforcement of the logic of the clash of civilisations, completely opposed to the feminist cause. Conclusion This paper argues for the importance of revisiting the feminist approach to the problem of the gender issue in Muslim societies; in particular through the acquisition of a more critical stance to the notion of modernity and to the gender issue itself. In fact, as has been shown, the gender issue represents the very essence of the entire logic of Orientalism. Therefore to gain a solution, or at least a serious attempt in tackling it, it is fundamental to undermine all the foundations of the orientalist bias and the thinking behind the clash of civilisations and of modernities. Nonetheless, it has been argued that some feminist practices, acting on different levels, have the counter-productive effect of reinforcing this logic and, at the same time, weakening the question of womenʼs rights in the Muslim world. This is due mainly to two reasons. Firstly, the general understanding that secular-liberal regimes, typical of the socalled West, have generally a better standpoint regarding the gender issue. Secondly, gendered rationales such as the Imperilled Women, Islamic Men and the Civilised Europeans and the Third World Sisters to be Saved, purport a monolithic vision of the Islamic world, contributing to the logic of the two opposing blocs. 38 Jamal, ʻTransnationalʼ, pp. 60-66. 11 Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... Therefore, in order to escape this dangerous vicious circle, a critical stance suggests a different method to face this issue. Starting from the idea that modernity is an incomplete project, without some models that are better than others, but rather stressing the importance of human agency to achieve an overall better modernity. This modus operandi consequently leads to a deeper understanding of the importance of the settings in which the gender issue is located. Indeed, in contrast with the idea of a monolithic Islam, the question of Muslim womenʼs rights presents different characteristics related to different contexts, thus requiring different solutions and means to achieve them39. However, such a background analysis should not remain within national borders themselves. Rather, the necessity is to deconstruct the single ideas of daughters, wives and mothers built on the state/women relationship, and reconstruct it on a universal level of human rights and international conventions against any kind of legal or social discrimination based on gender differences. This new process would be enforced by the fundamental agency of women themselves, that should be able to transcend national borders through global social movement activism, regardless of gender, ethnicity, class or religion40 . This would probably be the best attempt to go beyond the rationale of women and modernity itself, introducing the question of gender issues into a universal modernity. Bibliography Abu-Lughod L., ʻDo Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others, American Anthropologist, 104:3, 2002, 783-790. - ʻOrientalism and Middle East Feminist Studiesʼ, Feminist Studies, 27:1, 2001, 101-113. 39 40 Volpp L., ʻFeminism versus Multiculturalismʼ, Columbia Law Review, 101:5, 2001, p. 1217. Jamal, ʻTransnationalʼ, pp. 69-76. 12 IPM8430 24 May 2010 Ahmed A. S., Discovering Islam. Making sense of Muslim history and society, Routledge, 1998. Anthias F., ʻBeyond Feminism and Multiculturalism: Locating Difference and the Politics of Locationʼ, Womenʼs Studies International Forum, 25:3, 2002, 275-286. Beck L. And Keddie N., Women in the Muslim World, Harvard University Press, 1978. Beinin J., Stork J., Political Islam. Essays from Middle East Report, Tauris, 1997. Chatterjee P., Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World. A derivative discourse, Zed Books, 1986. Cole J. R., ʻFeminsm, Class and Islam in Turn-of-the-Century Egyptʼ, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 13:4, 1991, 387-407 Esposito J. L., Islam and Politics, Syracuse University Press, 1984. Foster H., Postmodern Culture, Pluto Press, 1985. Gole N., ʻSnapshots of Islamic Modernitiesʼ, Dedalus, 129:1, 2000, 91-117. Gonzalez Perez M., Women and Terrorism: Female Activities in Domestic and International Terror Groups, Routledge 2008. Habermas J., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: twelve lectures, MIT Press, 1991. Haddad Y. Y., Esposito J. L., Islam, Gender and Social Change, Oxford University Press, 1998. Hatem M. F., ʻEgyptian Discourses on Gender and Political Liberalization: Do Secularist and Islamist View Really Differ?ʼ, Middle East Journal, 48:4, 1994, 661-676. Hekman S., ʻTruth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisitedʼ, Signs, 22:2, 1997, 341-365. Hirschkind C. and Mahmood S., ʻFeminism, the Taliban and Policy of Counter-Insurgencyʼ, Anthropological Quarterly, 75:2, 2002, 339-354. Hoodfar H., ʻThe Veil in Their Minds and On Our Heads: The Persistence of Colonial Images of Muslim Women, RFR/DRF, 22:3/4, 2003, 5-18. Hourani A., Khouri P. S., Wilson M. C., The Modern Middle East, I. B. Tauris, 1993. Huntington S. P., The clash of civilisation and the remaking of the world order, Simon and Schuster, 1996. Jamal A., ʻTransnational Feminism as a Critical Practice. A reading of feminist discourses in Pakistanʼ, Meridians: feminism, race and transnationalism, 50:2, 2005, 57-82. Kandioty K., ʻWomen, Islam and the Stateʼ, Middle East Report, 173, 1991, 9-14. 13 Sebastiano Sali - sbs09 ‘The Status of Women is a Key... Keddie N. and Beck L., Women in the Muslim World, Harvard University Press, 1978. Lewis R., Gendering Orientalism. Race, femininity and representation, Routledge, 1996. Masud M. K., Salvatore A. and van Bruinessen M., Islam and Modernity. Key issues and debates, Edinburgh University Press, 2009. Meheran G., ʻThe Paradox of Tradition and Modernity in Female Education in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Comparative Education Review, 47:3, 2003, 269-286. Mernissi F., Islam and Democracy. Fear of the modern world, Virago Press, 1993. Mir-Hosseini Z., Islam and Gender, Princeton University Press, 1999. Moghadam V. M., Modernizing Women. Gender and Social Change in the Middle East, Lynne Rienner, 1993. Najmabadi A., ʻGender and Secularism of Modernity: How Can a Muslim Woman be French?ʼ, Feminist Studies, 32:2, 2006, 239-255. - ʻVeiled Discourse-Unveiled Bodiesʼ, Feminist Studies, 19:3, 1993, 487-518. Okin S. M., ʻIs Multiculturalism Bad for Women?ʼ, Boston Review Books, October/ November 1997. Available online at: http://bostonreview.net/BR22.5/okin.html. Razack S. H., ʻImperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Force Marriagesʼ, Feminist Legal Studies, 12, 2004, 129-174 - ʻThe ʻSharia Law Debateʼ in Ontario: the Modernity/Pre-Modernity Law Distinction in Legal Efforts to Protect Women from Cultureʼ, Feminist Legal Studies, 15, 2007, 3-32. Said E., Orientalism: Western Conception of the Orient, 1995, Penguin. - ʻOrientalism Reconsideredʼ, Cultural Critique, 1, 1985, 89-107. Spivak G. C., Outside in the Teaching Machine, Routledge, 1993. Toubia N., Women of the Arab World, Zed Books, 1988. Turner B. S., Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism, Routledge, 1994. White S. K., The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas. Reason Justice and Modernity, Cambridge University Press, 1988. 14